← All resources

The conversation to have before you let someone go

If a termination is a surprise to the person, you skipped the one conversation that could have changed the outcome.

The worst terminations I see are not the cruel ones. They are the ones that blindside someone who genuinely thought they were doing fine. Somewhere along the way, a manager decided it was over and never told the person the stakes had changed.

There is a conversation that belongs before that point. Not a performance review, not a warning dressed up in HR language. A direct, human talk about where things stand and what has to change. Here is how to have it.

Why this conversation gets skipped

It gets skipped because it is the most uncomfortable one a manager can have. Naming a performance gap is hard. Naming that the person’s job is on the line is harder. So managers tell themselves the feedback they have given was clear enough, that the person must know.

They usually do not know. There is a wide gap between “my manager seems a bit frustrated” and “my job is at risk.” If you have not closed that gap explicitly, you have not had the conversation, no matter how many smaller hints you dropped.

Be honest that the stakes are real

This is the line people dodge, and it is the whole point. The person needs to hear, in plain words, that this is serious. Not as a threat, as the truth.

Something like: “I want to be straight with you. The pattern we’ve talked about hasn’t changed, and if it continues, I don’t think this role is going to work out. I’m telling you now because I’d much rather help you turn it around than have us end up there.” That is not cruelty. The cruelty is letting someone coast toward an exit they never saw coming.

Define the gap and the bar

Once the stakes are clear, get specific about what has to be different. People cannot hit a target they cannot see. Name the gap concretely, name what good looks like, and put a timeframe on it.

  • What specifically is falling short, with examples
  • What the standard actually is
  • What support you will provide to help close it
  • When you will both check in on progress

If you cannot fill in all four, you are not ready to have this talk. Do the work to define them first.

Mean the support part

A manager who has privately given up sends a different signal than one still rooting for the person, and people read it instantly. If you walk in already certain it is over, this conversation becomes theater, and everyone can tell.

So check yourself first. Do you actually believe this person can recover, given a fair shot and real help? If yes, bring that. If no, then this is a different conversation, and you owe them honesty about that too rather than a fake runway.

Write down what you agreed

End with a shared, written summary. Not for the file, though it helps there too. For clarity. People under stress hear about half of a hard conversation, and the half they keep is rarely the half you most needed them to keep.

A short note afterward, in plain language, removes the ambiguity: here is what we discussed, here is what changes, here is when we talk again. Now there is no version where the person can honestly say they did not know.

Do this well and one of two good things happens. The person turns it around, which is the outcome you both wanted. Or they do not, and the eventual parting is fair, expected, and free of the bitterness that comes from being blindsided. Either way, you treated them like an adult who deserved the truth in time to use it.

Turn ideas into habits

Reading about leadership is a start. Practicing it with a coach is how it sticks. Book a free discovery call to see what that could look like for you or your team.